August 13, 2010

Today's Israel News Clippings August 13, 2010

Our thanks to Mike Sachs, Northeast Regional Director of AIPAC


Why Doesn't Abbas Want Peace Talks? - Jackson Diehl


Eighteen months ago, when the then-new Obama administration tried to jump-start Middle East peace negotiations, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas balked. He said he would not agree even to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unless Netanyahu made several big concessions in advance - including recognition of a Palestinian state on the basis of Israel's 1967 borders and a freeze on all Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank.


Convinced that Netanyahu was the problem, the Obama administration spent the next year in a crude and clumsy effort to extract those concessions. Netanyahu stoutly resisted; the administration belatedly discovered that it could not compel a democratic ally to comply with its demands. Eventually a rough compromise emerged: Netanyahu publicly accepted the idea, but not the pre-defined borders, of a Palestinian state; and he imposed a partial and temporary freeze on the settlements, which is due to expire in September. The administration agreed that should be good enough to start formal peace talks. But Abbas is still refusing to meet Netanyahu unless the Israeli leader - or Obama - guarantees those big concessions on borders and settlements in advance.


This is not, as Abbas' spokesmen contend, a matter of either principle or domestic politics. The Palestinian president has negotiated with numerous Israeli leaders and did so without a settlement freeze or other preconditions. Here we come to the real mystery about Abbas: Does he really want peace? Or would he, like Yasser Arafat before him, prefer the messy status quo to going down in history as the Palestinian who once and for all accepted a Jewish state? Abbas received a far-reaching offer from Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert, that met the territorial conditions he now sets. He refused to accept it even as a basis for negotiations. (Washington Post)

Should the U.S. Stop Funding the Lebanese Army? - Janine Zacharia


After Israel and Hizbullah fought a war in 2006, President Bush bolstered assistance to the Lebanese army to create a counterweight to the Shiite militia. Now, after a deadly clash last week between Israeli and Lebanese troops, some on Capitol Hill want to stop funding Lebanese forces entirely. A day before the Aug. 3 border fight between Israel and Lebanon, Rep. Howard Berman (D-Ca.), who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, had put a hold on $100 million in assistance to the Lebanese military because of his concern that Hizbullah's influence over the army had grown.


Some lawmakers in both parties have also expressed frustration at the Lebanese military's lax patrolling of the border with Syria and the continued flow of Iranian-made weapons to Hizbullah. Israel estimates the group has now amassed an arsenal of roughly 40,000 rockets, four times what it had during the 2006 war. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) said after spending more than $700 million over five years on the Lebanese military, "it has become clear that assistance to Lebanon has not advanced U.S. national security interests."


In interviews with former Lebanese military officials, current politicians and an array of observers in Lebanon, not a single person said he thought the army would take steps to disarm or distance itself from Hizbullah in the near term, with or without U.S. assistance. "Most of the Lebanese army now is against Israel and is pro-Hizbullah," said retired Lebanese general Elias Hanna. Israel and Lebanon are still technically at war. When Hizbullah took over Beirut in May 2008, the Lebanese army not only avoided confrontation, but also facilitated Hizbullah's seizure of certain key institutions. Many of the army's key figures are Shiites sympathetic to Hizbullah, including the powerful deputy head of Lebanese military intelligence. The last two Lebanese army commanders, both Christians, struck a pro-Hizbullah stance that helped them become presidents. (WashingtonPost)

Why the U.S. Must Make the Middle East Less Important - Michael Mandelbaum


American foreign policy this fall will feature the Middle East: we will see a push for direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, pressure on Iran to give up its nuclear-weapons program and the hope that Iraq will remain stable as U.S. troops leave. Experience suggests that the chances of success for all three are poor. Over the years, the Middle East has proven inhospitable, if not downright hostile, to American initiatives. Recognizing this, the two previous administrations launched signature programs to transform the region into a friendlier place for American interests. Both failed. The Obama team should try a different approach, one that begins at home.


The Clinton Administration tried and failed to make peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors. The Obama Administration's prospects are no brighter. Since no policy open to it can make the Middle East safe for the U.S. and the world, the Obama Administration should act to make the world safe from the pathologies of the Middle East. It can do that by making the region less important. The Middle East matters because the world depends heavily on its oil. Since the U.S. uses so much oil, a major reduction in American consumption would substantially lower the global total. The less oil the world uses, the less important the region that has so much of it becomes. (TIME)

Mike Sachs

Northeast Regional Director

212-750-4110 • Fax 212-750-4125

msachs@aipac.org

AIPAC • The American Israel Public Affairs Committee


Join us at the AIPAC National Summit, October 24-25
Visit www.aipac.org/Summit2010 for more information.

August 11, 2010

Today's News On Israel August 11, 2010

Our thanks to Mike Sachs, Northeast Regional Director of AIPAC



Lebanon Crisis Feared as Indictments Near in Assassination of Former Lebanese Prime Minister - Janine Zacharia


Hizbullah's leaders are pressuring the Lebanese government to end its cooperation with UN investigators from the tribunal set up to try suspects in the 2005 killing of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri, amid indications that some Hizbullah members will be accused of Hariri's killing in indictments expected as soon as next month. Many in the country now fear the indictments could trigger a new political crisis or even sectarian bloodshed. Traditional power brokers in Lebanon, including Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, have flocked to Beirut in recent weeks to try to avert a crisis. Lebanese sources said Abdullah was so concerned about Hizbullah's warnings that he is working to delay the release of the indictments.
On Monday, Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah claimed in an elaborate two-hour broadcast from his hiding place that Israel was behind Hariri's assassination. Lebanon's prime minister, Hariri's son, Saad Hariri, 40, now faces the painful choice of whether to continue to try to find out who killed his father or to acquiesce to Hizbullah in order to maintain Lebanese stability. (WashingtonPost)



Al Jazeera Spreads Hizbullah Conspiracy Theories - Avi Issacharoff and Amos Harel
Monday's speech by Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who tried to prove that his organization had nothing to do with the Hariri murder and conveniently pointed a finger at Israel, received widespread and often enthusiastic coverage in the Arab world, especially from Al Jazeera. In the Arab world today, Al Jazeera's support is as good as a court verdict, and is likely to be seen by many Arabs as proof positive of Israel's guilt. (Ha'aretz)



A Nuclearized Iran: Approaching the Point of No Return - Jeffrey Goldberg (Atlantic Monthly)

  • The U.S. Central Command, whose area of responsibility is the greater Middle East, has already asked the Pentagon what to do should Israeli aircraft invade Iraq's airspace on their way to Iran. According to multiple sources, the answer came back: do not shoot them down.
  • If a strike does succeed in crippling the Iranian nuclear program, Israel will have removed from its list of existential worries the immediate specter of nuclear-weaponized, theologically driven, eliminationist anti-Semitism; it may derive for itself the secret thanks of the Middle East's moderate Arab regimes, all of which fear an Iranian bomb with an intensity that in some instances matches Israel's; and it will have succeeded in countering the spread of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, which is a prime goal of the enthusiastic counter-proliferator who currently occupies the White House.
  • Israel has twice before successfully attacked and destroyed an enemy's nuclear program. In 1981, Israeli warplanes bombed the Iraqi reactor at Osirak, halting - forever, as it turned out - Saddam Hussein's nuclear ambitions; and in 2007, Israeli planes destroyed a North Korean-built reactor in Syria.
  • Iran is, at most, one to three years away from having a breakout nuclear capability (often understood to be the capacity to assemble more than one missile-ready nuclear device within about three months of deciding to do so). The Iranian regime, by its own statements and actions, has made itself Israel's most zealous foe; and the most crucial component of Israeli national-security doctrine is that no regional adversary should be allowed to achieve nuclear parity with the reborn and still-besieged Jewish state.
  • "You don't want a messianic apocalyptic cult controlling atomic bombs," Netanyahu told me in 2009. "When the wide-eyed believer gets hold of the reins of power and the weapons of mass death, then the world should start worrying, and that's what is happening in Iran." "Iranian leaders talk about Israel's destruction or disappearance while simultaneously creating weapons to ensure its disappearance."
  • An Israeli official who spends considerable time with the prime minister told me: "In World War II, the Jews had no power to stop Hitler from annihilating us. Six million were slaughtered. Today, 6 million Jews live in Israel, and someone is threatening them with annihilation. But now we have the power to stop them."

Mike Sachs

Northeast Regional Director

212-750-4110 • Fax 212-750-4125

msachs@aipac.org

AIPAC • The American Israel Public Affairs Committee


Join us at the AIPAC National Summit, October 24-25
Visit www.aipac.org/Summit2010 for more information.

August 9, 2010

Susan Siegeltuch Witkin Welcomes New Grandson

Mazel tov to Susan and to parents Keren Witkin and Neal Freedman on the birth of Sam Luke Witkin Freedman.

August 6, 2010

SYLVIA PFEFFER WELCOMES NEW GRANDSON

Sylvia Pfeffer is happy to announce the birth of Eli Nathan Schuldiner, son of Francine and Marvin. He was born August 5th. Eli is named after Sylvia's late husband, Lester.

August 2, 2010

Today’s News on Israel August 2, 2010

Temple member Mike Sachs is the Northeast Regional Director of AIPAC. For the last few months Mike has been sharing some of the news stories that he deems important for those of us who care about Israel and her well-being. I've found it helpful to have someone "in the know" cull through the overwhelming amount of news on Israel and share the key ones with me.

Starting today I will be sharing these articles here on the TSTI Rabbinic Blog. I urge you to take a few minutes each time one is posted to read at least one or two of them. Now more than ever it is important for us to make sure we are well-informed about what is going on in Israel and throughout the world with regard to Israel.

My thanks to Mike for sharing these with us and a reminder that, once again, Mike will be speaking on Yom Kippur between the morning and afternoon services to share some of the news of the day and suggest ways that we can get involved.

In today’s news…

Hamas Rocket Hits Children's Rehabilitation Center - Noam Bedein
On Saturday night a Palestinian rocket scored a direct hit on the children's hydrotherapy rehabilitation center, located in the heart of Sderot's Sapir College. The center provides therapy and workshops for special-needs children and is used by children from the entire country. The facility was decimated. On any other day, a catastrophe would have taken place. During weekdays, the center is packed with hundreds of children and therapists.


Rockets Hit Israel and Jordan Resorts; Four Hurt in Aqaba
Rockets from Egypt's Sinai struck Israel's and Jordan's Red Sea port resorts on Monday. In the Jordanian port of Aqaba, "the Grad rocket landed in a public street near a major five-star hotel and caused four injuries, with three persons lightly wounded and the other casualty in serious condition," a Jordanian interior ministry source said. (Reuters)


Israel: New Turkish Intelligence Chief May Disclose Israeli Secrets to Iran - Amos Harel (Ha'aretz)
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Sunday voiced concern that the appointment of new Turkish intelligence chief Hakan Fidan, who is close to Iran, could result in Tehran gaining access to Israeli secrets.
"In recent weeks a man who is a supporter of Iran was appointed to head Turkey's Mossad. There are a fair number of our secrets that are in [Turkish] hands. The thought that in the past two months they could have been open to the Iranians is quite disturbing," Barak said.

And in other “good news”…


Gaza Friday Sermon on Hamas TV: Muslims Should Wage Jihad to Liberate the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the Filth of the Jews
A Gaza Friday sermon, aired on Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV on July 16: "Dearly beloved, the Al-Aqsa Mosque [in Jerusalem] is subjected to a vicious campaign of Judaization and defilement, at the hands of the filthiest creatures made by Allah - the Jews....Today, we see the brothers of apes and pigs destroying homes with their occupants still in them, uprooting trees from their land, and killing women, children, and the elderly."
"Our people will never relinquish the Al-Aqsa Mosque or Palestine. We will redeem it with our souls, with our blood, with our sons...until this holy land is purified from the filth of the Jews." "When an enemy invades a Muslim country, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim man and woman. A son should set out on Jihad even without the permission of his father, a wife should set out even without the permission of her husband." (MEMRI)


No "Linkage" of Israeli-Palestinian Dispute to Other Regional Conflicts - James Kirchick
Why is it that Israeli apartment construction in east Jerusalem, and not, say, the mass killing of Muslims in Sudan, stirs the hearts of the Arab world? One would have been hard-pressed to find much substantive coverage of that genocide in the Arab media, which is busy directing the attention of Arabs to the many small ways in which "crusader Zionists" and their American allies oppress Muslims. The reason for the double standard can probably be found in the fact that the perpetrators of the Sudanese genocide were themselves Muslim (and Arab), and their victims black. But the stunted maturity of Arabs' political culture does not excuse Western acceptance of their hyperbole. Let the Arab and Muslim world show some anger at the vast array of human rights abuses committed by their own and against their own before we accept their mawkish claims of indignation on behalf of the Palestinians at face value.
It is one thing to say that the Palestinian people deserve a state. It is another thing entirely to say that their lack of having one is in any way responsible for bombings in Bali or Baghdad. To do so buys into the propaganda of the most vicious and reactionary forces in the Middle East, who cynically exploit the Palestinians for their own ends. There's no real reason to believe that Arab attitudes toward the U.S. would change were it to forge a deal between Israel and the Palestinians, a deal which, given the present state of Palestinian politics, would not last long.
Let the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolve itself on its own terms, if it is ever to be resolved, and let us not force upon the parties a solution that neither of them are willing to accept and that will only prove to be a prelude to the next phase of the Islamist struggle. The writer is a contributing editor for the New Republic. (World Affairs Journal)


For Biased Critics of Israel, Even Its Defensive Actions Violate Human Rights - Jeffrey Robbins
Earlier this month, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof devoted an entire column to calling upon Israel to lift the blockade of Gaza, while mentioning not one word about the rocketing of Israeli civilians that had brought about the blockade, and whose recurrence the blockade is intended to prevent. Indeed, for much of the past decade, Israel has been forced to defend itself from charges that defending itself is a crime.
From 2000 to 2004, the Palestinian leadership organized a suicide bombing campaign aimed at killing and maiming as many Israeli civilians as possible. About 1,100 Israelis were blown to pieces and 5,000 more were wounded or maimed. This is the rough proportional equivalent of about 55,000 Americans killed and 250,000 Americans wounded or maimed. A bombing campaign whose very purpose was to take innocent human life should have triggered universal condemnation of Palestinian violence. It didn't.
Similarly, from 2000 to 2008, families of southern Israel were subjected to between 8,000 and 10,000 rockets, missiles, and bombs fired at them by Hamas gunmen embedded in civilian neighborhoods in Gaza. Yet the progressive community remained largely silent. It turned out that it wasn't the 8 years of targeting Israeli civilians that was the human rights violation. It was the Israeli effort to stop the attacks from Gaza in 2009. The writer served as a U.S. Delegate to the UN Human Rights Commission under President Clinton. (Christian Science Monitor)


To the Chorus of Chronic, Compulsive Critics of Israel - David Harris
You just can't contain your rage against Israel, can you? A mere mention of Israel and you're out of the starting gate in record time with another tirade accusing it, and its defenders, of every conceivable evil in the world - from Nazism to Apartheid, from blood libel to mass murder - the facts be damned.
Could it be that your real ideal is a Hamas-run society, with its all-enveloping political and religious suffocation, relegation of women to the status of virtual male property, intimidation of the tiny Christian community, unadulterated anti-Semitism, and reverence for the cult of violence? The writer is Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee. (Huffington Post)


Can New York Times Reports on Israel Be Trusted? - Andrea Levin
A May 7 story by Ethan Bronner cited "Nancy Kricorian, a New York City novelist and poet who visited here for the first time as part of the Palestinian [writers'] festival," who was quoted as "infuriated" at "military checkpoints and the separation barrier." She was presented as an apolitical literary soul newly encountering Middle East realities. Actually, Kricorian is the New York coordinator of the Code Pink organization and promotes stridently anti-Israel political positions. TheTimes should require candid identification of radical (and factually questionable) sources being cited. The writer is executive director and president of CAMERA, Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America. (Jerusalem Post)



Mike Sachs

Northeast Regional Director

212-750-4110 • Fax 212-750-4125

msachs@aipac.org

AIPAC • The American Israel Public Affairs Committee


Join us at the AIPAC National Summit, October 24-25
Visit www.aipac.org/Summit2010 for more information.


July 12, 2010

WARSHAWS WELCOME FOURTH GRANDDAUGHTER

Hanie and Gerry Warshaw have a new granddaughter, Mackenzie Gray Fiore, born July 11. Mackenzie is the daughter of Amy and Anthony Fiore.

June 4, 2010

We've Begun Our Participation In The Congregational Greening Pilot Program - Here's The Press Release...

Union for Reform Judaism and GreenFaith Launch Congregational Greening Pilot Program

NEW YORK, NY, June 3, 2010 | 21st Sivan 5770 – Today the Union for Reform Judaism, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism and GreenFaith join together to launch the Greening Reform Judaism Pilot Program. Through the Pilot, eight Reform congregations in New Jersey will take part in the rigorous GreenFaith Certification Program, with the Union and GreenFaith underwriting the cost of their participation. The comprehensive Certification Program helps houses of worship across North America become environmental leaders through initiatives in facilities management, religious education and worship, and environmental justice. Upon completion, the synagogues will become certified as GreenFaith Sanctuaries and will be looked to as leaders in the Reform Movement’s greening efforts.

The eight congregations participating in the Pilot Program are Temple Shalom in Aberdeen, Temple Emanu-El in Edison, Barnert Temple in Franklin Lakes, Temple Shaari Emeth in Manalapan, Anshe Emeth Memorial Temple in New Brunswick, Temple Sharey Tefilo-Israel in South Orange, Temple Shalom in Succasunna, and Temple Sinai of Bergen County in Tenafly. Although the Certification Program is national in scope, the Union chose New Jersey as the focus of its Pilot Program so that its New York-based staff can visit each of the participating congregations and see their efforts firsthand.

“I am thrilled to partner with GreenFaith to launch the Greening Reform Judaism Pilot, and look forward to working with these outstanding congregations to help them become leaders in the urgent moral challenge of protecting our environment,” said Mark Pelavin, Director of the Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism. “Our Movement has focused intensely on our long-standing commitment to environmental issues in recent years and we are inspired by the enthusiasm of the congregations that jumped at the chance to participate in this Pilot Program.”

The Rev. Fletcher Harper, Executive Director of GreenFaith, said, “GreenFaith is excited to partner with the Union for Reform Judaism and the Religious Action Center to invest in this pilot effort, which is the first of its kind among North American denominations. We look forward to welcoming these eight outstanding congregations into the Certification Program’s interfaith community and to helping them become exemplary environmental leaders in the coming two years.”

Each participating synagogue has formed a “Green Team” and passed a Board Resolution endorsing the Certification Program. In addition to extensive support from GreenFaith and Union staff, the congregations will receive access to over 200 resources, six webinars and an online community – all organized by GreenFaith – where they can share questions, resources and events with fellow participants.

The Pilot Program congregations will take part in a wide variety of activities as part of the two year Certification Program. They will create an action plan based on a comprehensive audit, green their facilities’ operations, conduct environmental justice education and advocacy, offer environmentally-themed worship services and education programs for all ages, and communicate their work to local media outlets. They will take on the additional responsibility of serving as mentors to other Reform Jewish communities nationwide seeking to deepen their engagement with environmentalism. Congregational leaders will attend Union social action programs to share their experiences with the Reform Movement.

As Pelavin adds, “Our Jewish tradition, beginning with the Book of Genesis, commands us ‘to till and to tend’ our earth, and our synagogue communities take thismitzvah seriously. I look forward to seeing our Pilot Program congregations put these words into action as they lead the way to a greener and stronger Reform Movement.” Certification Program Director Stacey Kennealy said, “GreenFaith is encouraged to see the Reform Movement make such a strong public commitment to the protection of creation, and we are excited to see the many ways these synagogues will put their beliefs into action for the earth.”

June 3, 2010

The Gaza Incident: More Than Meets The Eye- A Few Thoughts

Dear Friends-

Much has been said and written about the maritime events off the coast of Gaza. Those events have created excuses for changes in diplomatic status and have once again led to attacks on Israel. It goes without saying that the loss of life as the result of such an incident is tragic. The key question however is WHO is responsible for this incident. World opinion seems to indicate that Israel is 100% responsible. If we were to look at the actual facts leading up to and surrounding the incident, however, a different picture emerges.

Here are some key facts I want to share with you. (With thanks to both UJC and AIPAC for gathering this information and more.)

Neither Israel NOR Egypt permits shipments into the Hamas controlled Gaza strip without them first being inspected. This only makes sense in light of Hamas' commitment to continue smuggling in arms and firing rockets into civilian populations. When the Israeli Defense Naval Forces intercepted the six ships attempting to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip early Monday morning they were simply enacting a long-standing policy of controlling the border.

The actual interception only took place after numerous warnings from Israel. The Israeli Navy requested the ships to redirect toward Ashdod where they would unload the cargo and transfer it to Gaza after being inspected.

The ships were reported to be carrying 10,000 tons of aid to Gaza. Israel pledged to deliver the goods but only after the ships were inspected. The inspections were important to help ensure that arms and material to fortify Hamas' bomb making facilities were not mixed in with the humanitarian aid. Israel's commitment to allowing such aid to enter Gaza should not be questioned, especially in light of the fact that Israel provides 15,000 tons of food and medical supplies to Gaza each week. These goods would simply add to what Israel wads already doing.

Moreover, I just got off of a series of conference calls on the matter and was not surprised to learn that much of the supplies that Israel sends into Gaza is taken by Hamas who then distribute it when they choose, often forcing Palestinian citizens to pay for goods that Israel supplied for free.

If the goal of the flotilla was to bring humanitarian aid to the residents of Gaza (rather than prompt an international incident) this would have been the path they followed. Moreover, the IDF stressed that the passengers could then return to their point of departure on the same vessels. This was clearly NOT the goal of the flotilla however. The Free Gaza Flotilla itself was organized by an extremist Islamic organization in Turkey. Their refusal to enter the safe harbor in Israel for customary cargo inspection procedures compelled Israel to intercept the ships.

The demonstrators on the boats were prepared for a conflict and when the IDF naval personnel boarded the ships, as they warned they would, the soldiers were attacked with knives, crowbars, metal clubs, and sledge hammers. Moreover, it has now emerged that there were several attempts to take the Israelis hostage. In addition, a soldier was stripped of his weapon and thrown to a deck 30 feet below and that weapon (or others that were already on the boat) was then used to fire upon the Israelis.

Only when naval forces determined that their lives were in immediate danger did they employ riot dispersal means. The results were tragic… but likely planned as the demonstrators had clearly prepared these weapons in advance for this specific purpose.

As a release from the United Jewish Communities of MetroWest puts it…

The coming days will be difficult ones for Israel — particularly as many in the international community have already begun to respond with great criticism and use this as an excuse to delegitimize Israel. Israel, within its rights to prevent delivery of materials that put Israeli citizens in harm's way, was placed in an extraordinarily difficult position. All evidence to date suggests that Israel acted in a manner that sought to avoid violence. As evidenced by the lack of violence on 5 of the 6 vessels, participants on one ship clearly sought a violent confrontation in an effort to create an international incident and to discredit Israel.
And as ARZA- the Association of Reform Zionists of America- states-

As so often happens after incidents such as this one, foreign governments were quick to condemn Israel for excessive use of force without full facts. Editorials in Israel note a mixed reaction to the Government’s action while still all affirming the right of sovereign self defense. The government of Israel has responded that Israel has the right to blockade Gaza ports to prevent weapons from entering that area and that Israeli Navy personnel were prepared to deal with protesters, not people armed with knives, crowbars and other weapons.

ARZA expresses its sorrow at the loss of life and expresses the hope that all those injured will soon recover from their wounds. ARZA further expresses the hope that governments and individuals will not rush to judgment but will wait for all the facts to emerge before coming to any conclusion. As is so often the case when dealing with incidents that occur in a very unsettled part of the world, it is often difficult to ascertain the facts but very easy to jump to conclusions.

The entire incident is regrettable and serves to highlight the issues currently facing Israel and the Middle East. There are many questions that deserve to be asked but one thing is clear… Israel did not enter this with the goal of creating an international incident and a loss of life. The organizers of the flotilla did. Sadly, once again only part of the story is being reported by the larger media.

I will be adding some links that might be of interest shortly...

Respectfully, Rabbi Daniel M. Cohen

May 28, 2010

Chavez And The Jews... Word Needs To Get Out

You might expect stories such as this to be emerging from Europe in the '30s and '40s. Sadly this report is about events in Venezuela over the past year. Even more sadly, the report comes from HDNet rather than NBC, CBS, CNN or some other huge media outlet.



April 29, 2010

Environmental Stewardship

We human beings are remarkably creative. Judaism teaches that we are the apex of God’s creative process. In the creation story we are told that after humanity came into being God said to Adam and Eve,

Be fertile and increase, fill the earth and master it, rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky and all the living things that creep on earth. (Gen. 1:28)


We have taken this charge to master the world to the extreme. We change and manipulate our environment in a way that no other being can imagine. We have mapped the genetic code for life and are just witnessing a revolution in our ability to manipulate the building blocks of existence. Before long we will be able to create human life in an entirely new way. And regardless of our feelings about cloning from a moral perspective, we cannot help but be awed by the human capacity to create.


But too often, we have taken the ancient call to master the world as a license to abuse our environment. We seem incapable of comprehending that with our mastery of creation comes a responsibility to protect, to guard and to care for the world. It is a responsibility we have neglected time and time again.


Two thousand years ago the rabbis of the Midrash (on Ecclesiastes 7:13) taught that after God had created the world, God took Adam by the hand and led him about the Garden. “See how beautiful all my Creations are,” said God. “All has been created for your sake. So reflect on this, and take care not to foul or destroy my world. For if you do, there will be none to repair it after you. And what is worse, you will bring death even to righteous people in the future.”


The rabbi who wrote this Midrash wanted us to understand that some intrusions into the natural world have irreversible effects. Eventually, too much change can doom even the innocent generations that have not yet been conceived. Two thousand years ago our tradition warned that if we do not become responsible caretakers, we will destroy the very world we have been charged to protect.


And yet during our watch,

Forests are shrinking, fish stocks are declining, soil degradation and desertification are rising, and pollution and waste are being generated at a far greater rate than the earth can absorb. Even our fresh water supply -- perhaps our most precious commodity -- is being pushed beyond the limit.


The environmental damage we have done is far more extensive than most of us realize and its impact will be felt for generations. As family therapist Gregory Bateson wrote in 1972,

We are learning by bitter experience that the organism which destroys its environment destroys itself. (Steps to an Ecology of the Mind 1972, p.491)


Bateson was neither a prophet nor an ecologist, but thirty years ago he already understood that as the fate of the planet goes, so, too, goes the fate of humanity. If we do not care about protecting nature for nature’s sake, perhaps we should care out of our own selfish self-interest. Humanity’s fate is tied to the fate of the planet in which we live.


Years later, though, the pace with which we are assaulting our planet has not slowed.

A native American teaching states,

Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons and daughters of the earth... we did not weave the web of life; we are merely a strand in it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. (Chief Seattle)


Thus we should not be surprised that a recent study in the journal “Science” reported that more people are killed by pollution related illness than by traffic accidents. In fact, cutting greenhouse gases in just four major cities could save over sixty thousand lives over the next twenty years. (San Paolo, Brazil, Mexico City, Santiago Chile and New York City)


When it comes to safeguarding the environment it seems that, if anything, we are going backwards. We have become a nation that is more concerned with an affront to the nation’s flag than by an offense against its rivers. We are a nation more concerned with protecting the rights of a two-cell embryo than with guaranteeing that today’s children have clean air to breath and pure water to drink. We are a nation that wants to see the genetic map untouched, but offers no such guarantees for nature. In a word, our priorities as a nation could not be worse at this time. They are selfish. They are greedy. And they are shortsighted. And that is being generous.


Perhaps it is time for us to heed an old Cree Indian prophecy that teaches,

Only after the last tree has been cut down. Only after the last river has been poisoned. Only after the last fish has been caught. Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten.


It is easy to condemn the large corporations that cut forests, create oil spills and lobby against any environmental law that reduces their bottom line. And they deserve to be condemned. It is easy to attack politicians when they vote to support short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national and world health. And they deserve to be attacked. But it is much harder to face the fact-- the incontrovertible fact-- that so much of this unrectifiable damage to God’s world goes on because of all of us. We can point fingers, but ultimately, we are responsible for what is going on. Our lifestyle drives the engine that strips forests, punches holes in the atmosphere and moves hundreds of species toward extinction. As Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said,

Our age is one in which usefulness is thought to be the chief merit of nature; in which the attainment of power, the utilization of its resources is taken to be the chief purpose of man in God’s creation. [we have] indeed become… a tool-making animal, and the world is now a gigantic toolbox for the satisfaction of [our] needs. (God in Search of Man)


The problem is that the toolbox is already stretched beyond its limit.

Our insatiable lust for material comfort and acquisition is causing this environmental disaster. The numbers are shocking. Since 1950 we Americans have used more resources than everyone who ever lived before us.


And even though we Americans only comprise 5 percent of the world’s population, in 1996 we used nearly a third of the world’s resources and produced almost half of its hazardous waste, dumping the equivalent of one ton of hazardous material into the ground each and every year. And since most landfills were not built to keep toxins from seeping into groundwater, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, each and every land fill has the potential to eventually leach poisons into the ground!! (Jews Money and Social Responsibility, Bush and Denkro pg 20)


And that was in 1996. 15 years later things have gone from bad to worse.


Life on this planet is based upon a delicate balance of forces. We, through our profound intellect, our need to accumulate, and our desire for convenience, are throwing off the balance in every corner of the globe.


A generation ago the thought that some day the oceans might become vast, lifeless deserts was inconceivable. Today, through the dual pressures of over-fishing and pollution is seems entirely possible. As computerized fishing trawlers the size of a football field now drag nets wide enough to swallow up a dozen Boeing 747 airplanes, entire swatches of ocean are emptied of life. With this remarkable technology 130 tons of fish can be drawn from the ocean in a single sweep.


Our insatiable hunger is stripping the very life from this planet. Everything I have read in recent weeks has vividly illustrated that the warning of forty years ago in Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring is becoming a become reality. But this time, the culprit is not DDT and other pesticides. This time, the culprit is our modern way of life.


Easter Island, a small, desolate island in the middle of the South Pacific, is a warning to us all. As one approaches the island she is greeted by a forest of hundreds of sculpted men known as moai, each of the sculptures weighs tens of tons. Yet when Polynesian voyagers accidentally landed on the rugged coastline of the island some 1600 years ago, they were greeted by a forest of palm trees. Not a tree remains today. This once flourishing Eden is now a treeless, windswept desert of barren rock.


It is only recently that archeologists have truly pieced together the tragic history of the island. Around 400 CE Polynesian voyagers accidentally landed on the uninhabited island. Although it was only seven miles long, it offered them everything they needed. They settled there and thrived. Although there is no written record, from the oral history we do know that the ancient islanders feverishly expressed themselves in stone, carving hundreds of figures who stood guard along the rugged coastline. Legend says that the statues walked from their inland quarry to their beach front platforms through a spiritual power called “mana”, however, archaeologists have shown that these 100 ton statues were actually moved into place using leverage, muscle and rollers carved from trees, lots and lots of trees. The islanders developed a technology that helped them achieve their goals but each time they used the technology it consumed dozens of trees. They were so focused on perpetuating their culture that they stripped the island bare.


They did not realize the ecological impact of their actions. At least not until it as too late. Animals had perished, the topsoil had washed away and by the time the last of the palm trees was cut down, their fate had been sealed forever. By the time the first Europeans arrived in 1726, the island was a barren desolate rock in the middle of the ocean. Not one palm tree remains today.

(NOVA HYPERLINK "http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/" Secrets of Lost Empires: Easter Island PBS Air date: February 15, 2000)


Our technology is far superior to that of the Easter Islanders. And our focus is on comfort and pleasure rather than carving stone figures. But the potential impact on the environment is similar, although for us it is taking place on a global scale. Rosh Hashanah is about renewal. This day is known as the birthday of the world, but after researching some of the environmental impact we have been having on our planet each birthday is looking more and more like a funeral.


We all stand guilty. We love our comforts. We think little of their long-term impact. But the consequences of our actions are catching up to us. I believe that if we can begin to raise awareness and make some small changes in what we do, we can make an impact. The changes will not be easy. And they will not be free. But our future, the future of all the generations to come, depends on it. Part of the problem is that we operate with the illusion; the fallacy that what we do is our choice and our choice alone. We have lost sight of the fact that we are all interdependent and what we do has a far-reaching impact that can linger for generations.


But what can we do? The first step is to turn to our religious tradition for we have inherited a tradition that teaches balance, a tradition that teaches commitment and a tradition that demands a greater respect for God’s creation than we are currently showing. Judaism demands that we look at the big picture, and understand fully, our responsibilities as caretakers of God’s world.


Rabbi Arthur Waskow suggests that role is central to the message of Judaism. He states,

I want to imagine a new version of the Jewish people- a new way of understanding and shaping ourselves. Imagine that we were to decide to see ourselves as having a mission, a purpose on the earth. A purpose to heal the earth- one that is not brand new but is described in the Torah as one of the greatest purposes of the Jewish people. (Torah of the Earth Vol.2 pg. 268)


In ways both direct and subtle, Judaism teaches that our task is to always be mindful of the ways in which our actions today will affect the world of tomorrow. What we do now will shape the world our children and children’s children will inherit. The balance and responsibility toward nature that we show today is a gift that will remain long after we have left this earth.


But, and this is really important, it does not help the planet or ourselves if we just merely feel guilty about it! It doesn’t help the planet or ourselves if we only give our concern lip service. We need to ACT -- to do something about it. And in this regard I have three suggestions.


First, we need to increase our appreciation of nature.

Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel wrote,

As civilization advances, the sense of wonder declines. Such decline is an alarming symptom of our state of mind. [Humankind] will not perish for want of information, but only for want of appreciation.


We are less likely to be apathetic about something we care deeply about. We are more likely to protect something that is close to our hearts.

In his book “A Walk In the Woods” Bill Bryson notes that in the mid-1960’s the wilderness path from Georgia to Maine known as the Appalachian Trail looked doomed to be buried under suburban sprawl of shopping malls and housing developments. Bryson writes:

Then, in a timely piece of fortuitousness, America got a secretary of the interior, Stewart Udall, who actually liked hiking. Under his direction, a National Trails System Act was passed in 1968. The law secured the future of the Trail by providing funds to purchase private lands to create a wilderness buffer around the entire trail. Today, less than 1 percent of the 2100 mile trail is on public roads and a huge area of wilderness is protected for the future. (Bryson pg. 112)


Those who spend time with nature often become its caretakers. Yet all too often the only contact many of us have with the natural world are beautifully manicured lawns, and heavily fertilized, golf courses that add to the destruction of natural habitats and the purity of groundwater. If we spend more time with nature, perhaps we will realize what we have to lose.


But appreciation alone won’t undo the harm we have caused. Therefore the next step is for us to recognize that small changes add up to big impact.

Every can we recycle is one less can that goes into a landfill.

Every degree we turn our air conditioner up or our heat down places less pollution into the air.

Every gallon of water we save in our home through a saving device on our showers and toilets leaves more safe drinking water for the future.

If every household in the United States replaced just 4 incandescent bulbs with compact florescent bulbs there would be no need for new energy generation. (coejl)


Every change we make does make a difference.


Finally, we can learn about the issue and speak up. An eastern teaching notes,

If you are thinking a year ahead, sow a seed. If you are thinking ten years ahead, plant a tree. If you are thinking a hundred years ahead, educate people. (Kuan Tsuroom)


Change happens when we increase our awareness of environmental issues and demand that our government start making responsible choices. We must become more aware of what is taking place, and demand that the future of the environment be moved to the top of the political agenda.


Our leaders DO respond to political pressure on these issues. In fact, in response to public pressure, Congress has recently been focusing more on energy conservation than on new drilling on public lands. (recent PEQ postcard) Our voices do get heard.


The Midrash teaches that one day an old man was planting a fig tree when a Roman general happened to pass by. He laughed at the old man and said, “You Jews are stupid. Don’t you realize it will take twenty years before that tree will grow enough to give fruit, and you will be long dead by then.”


The old man answered, “When I was a small child I could eat fruit because those who came before me had planted trees. Am I not obliged to do the same for the next generation? (Leviticus Rabbah 25.5)


The old man asked himself “Am I leaving this place better than I found it?” and his answer led him to act. Do our children and grandchildren deserve a world that is clean and healthy? Do they deserve to live in a planet that can sustain life and can surround them with beauty? That is the question before us. And as 50,000 barrels of oil spills into the Gulf of Mexico per day the question is more pressing than ever.